Regarding informed consent, which statement is NOT true?

Informed consent is a critical component of ethical medical practice and patient autonomy. One of the key elements of informed consent is that it must involve not just the approval of the physician but also a clear understanding and agreement from the patient themselves. This means the patient needs to be adequately informed about the treatment options, potential risks, benefits, and alternatives before making a decision.

The notion that consent requires solely the physician's approval undermines the fundamental principle that patients have the right to make their own informed choices regarding their health care. Informed consent is not about the physician merely getting a signature; it involves a dialogue where the patient actively participates in their care decisions. Valid informed consent means that the patient fully comprehends the implications of the decision they are making, rather than simply deferring to the physician's opinion or authority.

Other elements of informed consent, such as being voluntary and the need for the patient to understand the treatment, underscore the collaborative nature of the consent process, while involving next of kin, although sometimes necessary, is not a universal requirement in all consent situations. Thus, the idea that consent relies only on the physician's say-so is fundamentally at odds with the concept of informed consent.